Today’s wine critics often dispense with traditional references to wine.

They don’t talk about “surprisingly nuanced finish” or “earthy yet adequate construction.”
Instead they use analogies to describe what the wine is like. Now you too can punditize with the best of them. Just click on the button for an analogy to use in your next wine conversation.

This wine is like

Tired of pompous wine pundits and their pretentious pronouncements?

You know what I mean. The sniffing and swirling followed by their taste judgment. “It’s got an agreeably earthy aftertaste.” Or “it has an exquisitely sensuous bouquet.” Fight back! Now you can speak their language and let them hear how they sound.

Just click on the button for a phrase and use it the next time you sample a wine.

There’s no topic that pseudointellectuals like to discuss more than film.

They drop names of directors and cinematographers. They refer to neorealism
and symbolic fragmentation of allegorical structure. And they’re so full of themselves. Can’t take it anymore? No problem. Now you can fight back.

Just click on the button for an argument to use in your next film conversation.

There’s no topic that pseudointellectuals like to discuss more than film.

They drop names of directors and cinematographers. They refer to neorealism
and symbolic fragmentation of allegorical structure. And they’re so full of themselves. Can’t take it anymore? No problem. Now you can fight back.

Just click on the button for an argument to use in your next film conversation.

What is art? The honest answer is that nobody really knows.

But that won’t stop some “experts” from giving you their thoughts on the subject.
You know what I mean. They just have to explain their metaphysical turmoil from the lack of aesthetic spontaneity in contemporary abstract painting. Can’t these people just get over themselves? Now you can help them.

Just click on the button for an argument to use in your next artistic discussion.

Ever wish you could defend yourself against arrogant literati?

You know who I mean. Cultural egomaniacs who refer to the deconstruction of post-Focaultian criticism. Don’t you want to deconstruct them? — limb from limb.
Well, it’s your lucky day. Now you can engage in some phrase-to-phrase combat.

Just click on the button for an argument to use in your next literary discussion.

Wish you could get the upper hand when talking to music know-it-alls?

You could be talking about jazz, rock or classical. It doesn’t matter. They “know everything.” And they’re happy to drone on about sonic experimentation and ritualistic tonality. Want to shut them up?

Just click on the button for an argument to use in your next musical discussion.